Nexus One Pricing???

The folks at Mashable have a post up about the pricing on the Google's move into the cell phone business, the Nexus One.  It seem that it will be, at least initially, tied into the TMobile network.  The price is about that of the Droid and the iPhone.  This will be running the 2.1 version of the phone and will have a complete "Google" experience.  Not sure how much more Google a phone can get after using the Droid.  Not complaining just not sure what else they are going to do.  It's interesting and the web page for it is nice.  Still no good external reviews of the phone though.  Can't wait for that.  My guess is a CES release in the next week or so.

Update on Wednesday, December 30, 2009 at 12:28AM by Brian "Wags" Wagner

There is Apple Bias then there is the Apple Insider blog.  Here is what they had to say about the Nexus One and Android in general.  Remember the source when reading this it is very Apple Slanted.

Episode 15 - Nexus One, 5 important Distros, Recap of 2009 - Bonus Epidode

Episode 15 - Linuxinstall.net Podcast - The Holiday Season Bonus Edition

Episode running time: 47:33

1) Introduction

 2) News

Here is a link to a story that we definitely need to discuss:

Why google wants an ad based app phone

Five Linux Distros that changed linux....

3) Top 25 things of 2009

Google showed Linux and the OpenSource Community a lot of love this year with the release of:

Chrome OS

Android OS

Chrome Browser for Linux

Google Wave(Yeah who knows what you are supposed to do with it really?

Ubuntu One

Suse Studio

OpenSuse Build Service

Netbook Revolution

KDE/OpenSuse Choosing KDE

 4) Conclusion

E-Mail us at podcast@linuxinstall.net

Go to the WebSite to call us via Google Voice

Follow us on Twitter @linuxinstall

Follow us on Indenti.ca as linuxinstall or http://identi.ca/linuxinstall

Look for us and comment on iTunes, odeo  

Chrome OS quick review...

Chrome OS is Google's attempt to put Linux on net books in a way that anyone can use it. Google has stated that they will only be supporting specific hardware. For instance, the hard drive will have to be a solid state drive to keep the machine booting at the 7 second mark. The interface is really simplified. It's pretty much just a browser with some links disguised as a buttons.  The folks over at GDGT created a VMWare image of the new OS.  I downloaded it and tested it out using Sun's Virtual Box.  Here are my first thoughts about the new OS.

The less that perfect parts of Chrome OS:

You must be able to connect to the internet to be able to use it. This may change but seems to be a strong positive in Google's goal. The theory is that you can or will be able to do everything you need with Web based apps. When I am at home or in an area with Cell Signal this would be fine. Geton an airplane that doesn't have Wifi and the machine is going to be useless.

They don't want you to have to worry about drivers. So it's really unclear about how they plan on doing things like printing and other device connections. If they are planning on using CUPS(the open source print queue manager for Linux) they need to figure out or help the project work with cheaper printers. So how are we gonna get things that don't have drivers built in to work?

It may actually be too simple. The limitations are supposed to be beneficial but they may turn out to be too limited for even the most basic user. This is like reversing the trend from smart or app phones back to simple phones that just make calls. Not sure that it's a trend that will work. Only time will tell of course.

The good parts of Chrome OS:

It's simple. Really this is the perfect for my 80+ year old Grandfather. He wants to do E-Mail and look at our pictures and this is really the easiest OS to do it with. The OS could be nice for that purpose.

It boots really quickly. It connects easily to the network. It just works. Don't be undersold by those factors.

Conclusion:

All in all it's a wait and see moment for the new Google project. It may work but the discussion of merging it with Android seems to make more sense in the long term.  The real ultimate endgame though should probably be separate OSes with the ability to share apps.  That would provide the best of both worlds.