Can Windows uefi stop Multiboot of Linux??

With the Windows 8 announcement there has been a lot of concern about comments made that Microsoft would require manufactures who want the "Optimized for Windows 8" sticker to use UEFI and key it to the MS installed OS.  So what would that mean?  Well the concern is that it would mean you couldn't install Linux.  It would also mean that you wouldn't be able to boot from any third party CD.  So no one, except maybe MS, would be able to create a bootable disk for repair, Antivirus, and disk partitioner will be able to create their disks or tools.   The there is the whole Monopoly issues.  Also the fact that MS has been spending all kinds of time and money to try and get the Open Source world off it's back and this would just destroy all of that work.  Then there is the whole issue with people who won't ever really install Linux but not buy the hardware just because they know they can't.  A Bios switch is a great way to have this particular piece of tech and use it.  After all Microsoft really does have a positive reason for wanting this done for antivirus protection.


VMWare is planning on taking on Microsoft....

The Var Guy is reporting a follow up on VMWare's plans to use Zimbra, the open Source E-mail/Groupware solution they purchased from Yahoo in January.  What is being discussed and reported is that VMWare will begin selling and supporting Applicances with the opensource software installed and configured.  They will not be starting their own hosting option but instead rely on the over 500 existing VMWare hosting focused companies.  The goal of this is go directly after Microsofts E-Mail product Exchange.  This should be interesting to watch.

When Experts aren't Experts bad stories happen...

I came across this story about Windows vs. Linux Servers on the IT World Website.  The supposed expert states things like "Windows access control "blows Linux out of the water," he claims. "In a Windows box, you can set access-control mechanisms without a software add-on." "  Since I setup access control on Linux servers on a regular basis.  I have never needed a software add-on to do it.  Several of the companies I have worked for have used tools that manage all of their servers in a unified and automated manner.  These tools however were used for all of the systems in their environment be they Unix, Linux, Windows and even the Mainframe.

The "Expert" also seemed to think it was harder to manage a Linux Server over a Windows Sever.  This is strictly a matter of what you are used to.  While there were times in my past where I did Administer Windows Servers.  Going back now and trying to do things is difficult because of how much has changed.  Learning and becoming an expert in any operating system takes time and requires work.

Companies need to evaluate the Linux vs. Windows choice based on what they are trying to do.  Everyone needs to not make this decision on a case by case basis.  There are no hard fast rules and staffing and cost will always be the biggest things to determine it.